ISLAMABAD: throughout examination by the legal team of former president retired General Pervez Musharraf, Interior Secretary Shahid Khan admitted that he had not incorporated the difficulty of military coup of Gregorian calendar month 1999 within the charges levelled within the treason case due to a ‘time constraint’.
Khan has already testified before the special court, headed by Sindh state supreme court Justice Faisal Arab, that once presumptuous charge of his post in Gregorian calendar month 2013, he received the findings of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) and filed the grievance against information Musharraf on 5 charges.
When asked by Farogh Nasim whether or not it had been his duty to include the Gregorian calendar month 1999 coup within the grievance, Khan replied, “it is correct to counsel that it had been my duty to incorporate the Gregorian calendar month 1999 military coup below Article half-dozen, however I didn't have time to try to to therefore.”
“When I assumed charge as interior secretary on Gregorian calendar month thirteen, the matter had already been probed and therefore the JIT then submitted its report back to my workplace,” aforesaid Khan.
Shahid Khan says he didn’t embody 1999 coup charges as a result of ‘time constraint’
Barrister Nasim then asked him whether or not he believed that the July five, 1977 military coup — once General Ziaul Haq toppled the govt of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto — was conjointly associate degree act of treason; the inside secretary aforesaid this would possibly be Article half-dozen of the Constitution. However, once Nasim aforesaid, “Do you recognize that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif conjointly power-assisted and abetted General Zia within the imposition of law in July 1977,” adult male Khan merely replied “I don’t know”.
Nasim then asked adult male Khan, “Why did the inside secretary not ponder the serial military coups of 1958, 1977 and 1999 whereas launching the grievance against General Musharraf,” to that the inside secretary replied, “No inquiry was ordered against these coups, nor were these matters brought before me”.
“Are you tuned in to the storming of the Supreme Court in 1997 and was that act not a subversion of the Constitution,” asked attorney Nasim. In reply, Khan merely aforesaid, “I don't have the facts of that prevalence.”
During Wednesday’s proceedings, lead attorney Mohammad Akram Arab chief raised many objections over a number of the queries Farogh Nasim place to the witness and even joked that the counsel would possibly raise a matter associated with the Jallianwala Bagh incident, that materialized in 1919.
In response, Nasim aforesaid the country had witnessed a homogenous incident simply last week in Model city, Lahore.
The special court then adjourned proceedings till Th, once Farogh Nasim would continue his examination of the inside secretary.
Post a Comment Facebook Disqus